UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 8-K

 


 

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(D)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

September 18, 2017

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)

 

Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

Delaware

 

001-37635

 

45-4241907

(State or other jurisdiction

 

(Commission

 

(IRS Employer

of incorporation)

 

File Number)

 

Identification No.)

 


 

25 Broadway, 9th Floor

 

 

New York, New York

 

10004

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (212) 332-3241

 

 

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

 

o            Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425).

 

o            Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12).

 

o            Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)).

 

o            Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).

 

Emerging growth company x

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. x

 

 

 



 

Item 8.01. Other Events

 

On September 26, 2017 and September 27, 2017, Herriot Tabuteau, M.D., Axsome Therapeutics’ (the “Company”) Chief Executive Officer will present at the Ladenburg Thalmann 2017 Healthcare Conference and The Cantor Fitzgerald Global Healthcare Conference (the “Conferences”), respectively.  Dr. Tabuteau will be presenting at the Conferences to provide an overview of the Company’s business and late-stage clinical product candidates, AXS-02, AXS-05, and AXS-06.

 

Attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K is a copy of the updated presentation slide deck to be used in connection with these planned presentations.

 

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

 

(d)             Exhibits.

 

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

99.1

 

Corporate Presentation

 



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 

 

Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.

 

 

 

 

Dated: September 18, 2017

By:

/s/ Herriot Tabuteau, M.D.

 

Name: Herriot Tabuteau, M.D.

 

Title: Chief Executive Officer

 


Exhibit 99.1

 

 NASDAQ: AXSM September 2017 © 2017, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.

GRAPHIC

 


Forward-Looking Statements & Safe Harbor Certain information contained in this presentation may include “forward-looking statements” within the meani ng of the Pri vate Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We may, in some cases, use terms such as “predicts,” “believes,” “potential,” “conti nue,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “may,” “could,” “might,” “will,” “should” or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes to identify these forward-looking statements. In particular, the Company’s statements regarding trends and potential future results are examples of such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements include risks and uncertai nties, includi ng, but not limited to, the success, timi ng and cost of our ongoing clinical trials and anticipated clinical trials for our current product candidates, including statements regarding the timing of initiation and completion of the trials, interim analyses and receipt of interim results; the timing of and our ability to obtai n and maintain U.S. Food and Drug Administration or other regulatory authority approval of, or other action with respect to, our product candidates; the Company’s ability to obtain additional capital necessary to fund its operations; the Company’s ability to generate revenues in the future; the Company’s ability to successfully defend its intellectual property or obtain the necessary licenses at a cost acceptable to the Company, if at all; the successful implementation of the Company’s research and development programs; the enforceability of the Company’s license agreements; the acceptance by the market of the Company’s product candidates, if approved; and other factors, i ncluding general economic conditions and regulatory developments, not withi n the Company’s control. These factors could cause actual results and developments to be materially different from those expressed in or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results may differ materially from those projected . The forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of this presentation and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstance. This presentation also contains estimates and other statistical data made by i ndependent parties and by us relating to market size and other data about our i ndustry. This data i nvolves a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates. Neither we nor any other person makes any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such data or undertakes any obligation to update such data after the date of this presentation. In addition, these projections, assumptions and estimates are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk.

GRAPHIC

 


 Axsome is addressing growing markets, where current treatment options are limited or inadequate, by leveraging well-characterized compounds to create nov el therapeutics to meet unmet medical needs and improve the lives of patients.

GRAPHIC

 


Our Candidates and Pipeline • Three differentiated late-stage assets targeting significant and growing markets: – AXS-02: oral, non-opioid, long-acting, potentially first-in-class therapeutic for chronic pain – AXS-05: novel therapeutic combination with multiple mechanisms for CNS disorders – AXS-06: rapidly-absorbed, once-daily, non-opioid, pain therapeutic with a gastroprotectant • Results from 3 ongoing Phase 3 trials expected over the next 12 months. • Novel indications, positive proofs of concept. • Patent protection to 2034, Worldwide rights. Product Candidate Preclinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 AXS-05 (DM + BUP) AXS-02 (DZT) AXS-06 (MoSEIC™ Mx + Eso) Treatment Resistant Depression: Fast Track Granted Initiated Agitation in Alzheimer’s Disease: Fast Track Granted Initiated CRPS: U.S. & E.U. Orphan Designation; Fast Track Granted Initiated Knee OA with BMLs: SPA Received; Fast Track Granted Initiated CLBP with MCs OA and RA Abbreviations : BML = Bone Marrow Les ions ; BUP = Bupropion; CLBP = Chronic Low Back Pain; CRPS = Com plex Regional Pain Syndrom e; DM = Dextrom ethorphan; DZT = Dis odium Zoledronate Tetrahydrate; Es o = Es om eprazole; MC = Modic Changes ; Mx = Meloxicam ;OA = Os teoarthritis ; RA = Rheum atoid Arthritis ; SPA = Special Protocol As s es s ment.

GRAPHIC

 


 AXS-05 Dextromethorphan (DM) + Bupropion (BUP) Novel therapy for CNS disorders: • Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) • Agitation in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)

GRAPHIC

 


 Relevant Indications Related Agents Ketam ne Memant ne Namenda® F uvoxam ne Luvox® DonepezA cept® Duloxet ne Cymbal a® Venlafax ne E exor® Esc alopram Lexapro® F uoxet ne P ozac® Ser al ne Zolof ® Bupropion Wel but n® Bupropion Wel but n® Relevant Pharmacodynamic Synergy Mechanism of Action DM BUP AXS-05 DM+BUP NMDA Receptor Antagonist Sigma-1R Agonist Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitor Nicotinic ACh Receptor Antagonist •i() •li() •il ( ri) •i(t) •i( ff) •it() •li( r) •tr i(t ) •(lri) •(lri) DM = Dextrom ethorphan; BUP = Bupropion.Pres ent

GRAPHIC

 


 Pharmacodynamic Synergy Relevant Indications1 Mechanism of Action DM BUP AXS-05 DM+BUP NMDA Receptor Antagonist Sigma-1R Agonist Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitor Nicotinic ACh Receptor Antagonist • Ketamine • Memantine (Namenda®) • Fluvoxamine (Luvox®) • Donepezil (Aricept®) • Duloxetine (Cymbalta®) • Venlafaxine (Effexor®) • Escitalopram (Lexapro®) • Fluoxetine (Prozac®) • Sertraline (Zoloft®) • Bupropion (Wellbutrin®) • Bupropion (Wellbutrin®) DM = Dextrom ethorphan; BUP = Bupropion. Pres ent Relevant 1. Indications listed are associated w ith the mechanism of action and are not related to either DM or BUP, unless specif ically noted. 2. Agents do not contain DM or BUP, unless specif ically noted.

GRAPHIC

 


 DM Alone DM DXO DM Rapid metabolism Difficult to achieve potential therapeutic plasma levels. AXS-05 (DM + BUP) Inhibits DM metabolism BUPDM DXO DMBUP • Pharmacokinetic synergy • Potential pharmacodynamic synergy • Potential efficacy in CNS disorders DM concentration increased to therapeutic range DM = Dextrom ethorphan; DXO = Dextrorphan; BUP = Bupropion. • Phase 1 trials with AXS-05 completed: – Significant increase in DM plasma levels. • Phase 3 trials in TRD and AD Agitation initiated. BUP active at CNS receptors IP Overview • 21 issued patents – protection through 2034.

GRAPHIC

 


 Dextromethorphan AUC Dextromethorphan Cm ax 1700 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 160.0 1686 Cmax ng/mL AUC0-12 ng*hr/mL 80.0 28 0 DM 60 mgDM 60 mg + BUP 150 mg (AXS-05) 0.0 3.8 DM 60 mgDM 60 mg + BUP 150 mg (AXS-05) Axsome data on f ile. †DM, Dextromethorphan; BUP, Bupropion.

GRAPHIC

 


 Dextromethorphan AUC Dextromethorphan Cm ax 1700 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 160.0 1686 Cmax ng/mL AUC0-12 ng*hr/mL 80.0 28 0 DM 60 mgDM 60 mg + BUP 150 mg (AXS-05) 0.0 3.8 DM 60 mgDM 60 mg + BUP 150 mg Dose† Cm ax ng/mL DM 20 mg + Q 10 mg 53 DM 30 mg + Q 10 mg 85 Axsome data on f ile. † Nuedexta® NDA 021879, FDA Clinical Pharmacology Review . DM, Dextromethorphan; Q, Quinidine; BUP, Bupropion.

GRAPHIC

 


 • Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disease burden in the US.4 • 63% and 44% of MDD patients have inadequate response to initial therapy and second line therapy, respectively.2 • Only 1 approved drug for TRD = unmet medical need. • AXS-05 combines the MOA of 4 distinct anti-depressant drug classes into one novel oral therapeutic. • DM antidepressant effects demonstrated preclinically and clinically. • Phase 3 ongoing. 3M patients in the U.S.1-3 Product Candidate Preclinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 AXS-05 Treatment Resistant Depression: Fast Track GrantedInitiated 1. Marcus SC, Olf son M. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010;67:1265-1273. 2. Rush AJ, et al. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:1905-1917. 3. U.S. Census Bureau, Population April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013. 4. Mathers CD, PLoS Med 2006; 3(11): e442.

GRAPHIC

 


 • DM and metabolic inhibitor reduce depressive symptoms in TRD and in AD. Symptom Reduction in TRD Patients Treated with DM and Metabolic Inhibitor1 Depressive Symptom Reduction in AD Agitation Patients Treated with DM and Metabolic Inhibitor2 DM+Q Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating (MADRS) Scale (30/10 mg) Change in Cornell Scale Score -5 -10 -15 ** ** ** ** 0.0 -0.5 -20 DM/Q Titration DM/Q 45/10 mg q 12 hrs Wk 1 Wk 2 Wk 4 Wk 6 Wk 8 Wk 12 Time (weeks) -1.0 P=0.002 • Failed 2 to 10 prior treatments • 45% of patients had 50% reduction in MADRS ** P<0.01 versus baseline 1. Murrough J, et al. J Affect Disord. 2017;218:277-283. 2. Cummings J, et al. JAMA. 2015;314:1242-1254.

GRAPHIC

 


 A Phase 3 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of AXS-05 in the treatment of TRD. 1:1 randomization of inadequate responders Period 1, Open-label (6 weeks)Period 2, Double-blind (6 weeks) N=346 Arm A AXS-05 Bupropion BUP = Bupropion; DM = Dextrom ethorphan. (n=173) Arm B (n=173) (BUP + DM) Bupropion • Primary Endpoint: Change in depression score from randomization to end of study, measured using the Montgomery-As berg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). • Key Inclusion Criteria: – Male or female 18-65 years old – History of inadequate response to 1 or 2 adequate antidepressant treatments

GRAPHIC

 


 • Agitation and aggression seen in approximately 45% of AD patients during 5-year period.3 • Characterized by emotional distress, aggressive behaviors, disruptive irritability, disinhibition, and caregiver burden.4 • Associated with4,5: – Accelerated cognitive decline – Earlier nursing home placement – Increased mortality • No approved medication = unmet medical need. • Proof of concept: DM plus metabolic inhibitor reduced agitation in AD patients. • Phase 2/3 ongoing. 2M patients in the U.S.1,2 Product Candidate Preclinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 AXS-05 Agitation in Alzheimer’s Disease: Fast Track GrantedInitiated 1. Ryu, SH, et al. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;13:976-983. 2. Hebert, LE, et al. Neurology. 2013;80:1778-1783. 3. Steinberg M, et al. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;2:170-177. 4. Antonsdottir IM, et al. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;11:1649-1656. 5. Rabins PV et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2013; 9:204-207.

GRAPHIC

 


 • Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-stage trial. – Placebo (n=125), 30 mg DM + 10 mg quinidine (Q) (n=93), for stage 1. • DM+Q treatment reduced agitation/ aggression in AD by 46% vs. 24% for placebo (P<0.001)—primary endpoint. • Statistically significant improvement in multiple secondary endpoints. • DM plasma levels achieved with AXS-05 in target therapeutic range. • Potential for additional contribution from bupropion component of AXS-05. Change in Agitation/Aggression Scores in AD with DM and Metabolic Inhibitor Quinidine (Q) PlaceboDM+Q Change in NPI Agitation/Aggression Domain -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 P<0.001 -4.0 Cummings J, et al. JAMA. 2015;314:1242-1254.

GRAPHIC

 


 A Phase 2/3 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of AXS-05 in the treatment of Agitation in AD. Screening Double-blind Phase (5 weeks) Arm A (n=145) Arm B (n=145) Arm C (n=145) (BUP + DM) N=435 1:1:1 randomization Bupropion Placebo BUP = Bupropion; DM = Dextrom ethorphan. • Primary Endpoint: Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI). • Key Inclusion Criteria: – Diagnosis of probable Alzheimer’s disease – Clinically significant agitation • Interim analysis planned.

GRAPHIC

 


 S-02 Disodium Zoledronate Tetrahydrate Novel therapy for chronic pain: • Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) • Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) with Bone Marrow Lesions (BMLs) • Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) with Modic Changes (MCs) CRPS image source: Voet C, et al. F1000Reseach. 2014;3:97.

GRAPHIC

 


 AXS-02 Disodium Zoledronate Tetrahydrate Oral Dose Long-acting Targeted Therapy Non-opioid Nov el Mechanism IP Overview • 59 issued patents* – protection through 2034. • Drug delivery, pharmacokinetic, composition of matter, and method of use claims. • U.S. Orphan Drug Designation (7 years exclusivity). • E.U. Orphan Medicinal Product Designation (10 years exclusivity, 12 years with PIP). *Claims cover AXS-02 and related substances and disease indications.

GRAPHIC

 


 AXS-02 Disodium Zoledronate Tetrahydrate Inhibits bone-resorbing osteoclasts Downregulates acid-sensing* ion channels Reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine production Anti-angiogenic Decreased bone resorption. Farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS).1 ASIC1a expression. ASIC activation.2 TRPV1 activation.2,3 TNF production.4 IL-6 production.5 IL-8 production.6 Angiogenesis.7 c-FOS expression.2 * Acid is a w ell know n cause of pain. 1. Green JR, Rogers MJ. Drug Dev Res. 2002;55:210-24. 2. Nagae M, et al. Bone. 2006;39:1107-15. 3. Abe Y, et al. J Bone Miner Metab . 2015;33:125–134. 4. Wolf AM, et al. Haematologica. 2006;91:1165-71. 5. Derenne S, et al. Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:2048-56. 6. Stathopoulos GT, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178:50-9. 7. Misso G, et al. Cancer Biol Ther. 2012;13:1491-500.

GRAPHIC

 


 Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) • Localized bone resorption.1,2 • Increased pro-inflammatory cytokines.3 Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) with Bone Marrow Lesions (BMLs) • BMLs are associated with pain in knee OA.5 • BMLs: Increased bone turnover; Decreased bone mineral density.6,7 Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) with Modic Changes (MCs) • MCs are associated with low back pain.8 • MCs: Increased bone turnover, pro-inflammatory cytokines, vascular density.9,10 case per year in the U.S.4 7M patients in the U.S.11-14,16 1.6M patients in the U.S.11,12,15,16 1. Capello ZJ, et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:288-296. 2. Krämer HH, et al. Pain. 2014;155:889–895. 3. Parkitny L, et al. Neurology. 2013;80:106-117. 4. Moseley GL, et al. J Pain. 2014;15:16-23. 5. Driban JB, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R112. 6. Hunter DJ, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11:R11. 7. Kazakia GJ, et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:94-101. 8. Zhang Y, et al. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1289-1299. 9. Järvinen J, et al. Spine: ISSLS Society Meeting Ab stracts. Oct. 2011(vol suppl, abstract GP127). 10. Rahme R, Moussa R. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:838–42. 11. Law rence RC, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:26-35. 12. Zhang Y, Jordan. JM Clin Geriatr Med. 2010;26:355–69. 13. Tanamas SK, et al. Rheumatology. 2010;49:2413–19. 14. Guermazi A, et al. BMJ. 2012;345:e5339. 15. Jensen OK, et al. Spine J. Feb. 14, 2014;pii:S1529-9430(14)00214-9. 16. U.S. Census Bureau, Population April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013.

GRAPHIC

 


 Phase 1 Summary • Oral administration of AXS-02 resulted in rapid absorption of zoledronic acid. • Significant plasma levels attained. • Robust pharmacodynamics (PD) effects. • PD relevant to targeted pain indications. • AXS-02 was well tolerated. 0% -50% Time (Days) 0 4 8 12 16 Zoledronic acid IV (1mg) AXS-02 Oral Tablet (Dose A) AXS-02 Oral Tablet (Dose B) AXS-02 Oral Tablet (Dose C) Change in Osteoclast Activity (Serum CTx) • Assessed in 6,097 patients treated 3 years with oral or IV bisphosphonates: – Oral: clodronate or ibandronate, daily – IV: zoledronic acid, monthly, then every 6 months • Oral preference at randomization and -100% Patient Preference 60% 40% 20% 0% 24% 76% therapy completion: 76%, 73% respectively. • Potential safety advantage. IV Preference Oral Preference 1. Gralow , et al. J Clin Oncol. 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 503). 2. Gralow , et al. J Clin Oncol. 32.5, 2014 (suppl; abstr 558).

GRAPHIC

 


CRPS Overview • Severe, continuous, disabling pain in a limb: – Sensation described as burning, stabbing, grinding, throbbing • Localized bone resorption,1,2 increased pro-inflammatory cytokines.3 • Common pain meds (e.g., NSAIDs, opioids, gabapentin) are considered ineffective.4 • No approved drug = high unmet need. • Phase 3 ongoing. • Issued U.S. patents: protection into 2034 – uses of oral zoledronic acid for CRPS. *Bone scan: hands** Orphan Disease case per year in the U.S.5 Product Candidate Preclinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 AXS-02 CRPS: U.S. & E.U. Orphan Designation; Fast Track GrantedInitiated * Goebel A, Complex regional pain syndrome in adult. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(10):1739-1750, by permission of Oxf ord University Press. ** Sampath S, et al. Indian J Nucl Med.2013;Jan-Mar;28(1):11–16. 1. Capello ZJ, et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:288-296. 2. Krämer HH, et al. Pain. 2014;155:889–895. 3. Parkitny L, et al. Neurology. 2013;80:106-117. 4. Bruehl S. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:713-725. 5. Moseley GL, et al. J Pain. 2014;15:16-23.

GRAPHIC

 


 Preclinical: • Well validated CRPS model replicates: Inciting trauma, clinical presentation, natural history, and pathologic changes. • Oral administration of AXS-02: Significant pain and edema reduction; improved weight bearing. AXS-02 Effect in CRPS Model % Change vs. Placebo 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 Clinical: • Clinical Trials: 5 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, with 4 different bisphosphonates.1-5 • Pain reduction: Mean 54% reduction in VAS pain scores (range 33% to 66%) during double-blind phases. • Statistical significance: p<0.0001, p=0.001, p<0.01, p<0.05, p=0.048. • Potency of bisphosphonates: 1/1000 to 1/20 potency of AXS-02.6 -80 -100 P<0.001 P=0.03 1. Adami S, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56:201-204. 2. Varenna M, et al. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:1477-1483. 3. Robinson JN, et al. Pain Med. 2004;5:276-280. 4. Manicourt DH, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:3690-3697. PainEdemaWeight Bearing 5. Varenna M, et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52:534-542. 6. Green JR, Rogers MJ. Drug Dev Res. 2002;55:210-224.

GRAPHIC

 


CRPS Phase 3 Design CRPS Treatment Evaluation 1 Study A Phase 3 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of AXS-02 in the treatment of pain associated with CRPS type 1. Screening, Baseline Double-blind Phase (12 weeks) N=190 1:1 randomization Arm A (n=95) Arm B (n=95) AXS-02 (disodium zoledronate tetrahydrate) Placebo 12 week follow-up • Primary Endpoint: Change in pain intensity from baseline to week 12, measured using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). • Key Inclusion Criteria: – Male or female 18 years old, recently diagnosed with CRPS type 1 – Average NRS pain intensity score of 5 • Dosage: Once per week for six weeks; no drug for last six weeks. • Interim analysis: When approximately half of patients have completed double-blind phase.

GRAPHIC

 


 • Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) on MRI are associated with pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA).1 • BMLs are regions of increased bone turnover, and reduced mineral density.2,3 • Zoledronic acid inhibits bone resorption and increases mineral density. MRI: knee side view* Femur A P • Phase 2 results: Zoledronic acid reduced pain and BML size in patients with knee osteoarthritis. BML Tibia • Phase 3 being conducted under Special Protocol Assessment (SPA). • Issued U.S. patents: protection into 2034 – uses of zoledronic acid for knee pain. 7M patients in the U.S.4-9 * MRI show ing BML in medial tibia f rom Driban, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R112. 1. Driban JB, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R112. 2. Hunter DJ, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11:R11. 3. Kazakia GJ, et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:94-101. 4. Law rence RC, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:26-35. 5. Zhang Y, Jordan. JM Clin Geriatr Med. 2010;26:355–69. 6. Tanamas SK, et al. Rheumatology. 2010;49:2413–19. 7. Guermazi A, et al. BMJ. 2012;345:e5339. 8. Jensen OK, et al. Spine J. Feb. 14, 2014;pii:S1529-9430(14)00214-9. 9. U.S. Census Bureau, Population April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013.

GRAPHIC

 


 Change in Pain Intensity at 6 Mos Change in BML Size at 6 Mos BML at Baseline and Post 0.0 PlaceboZoledronic acid 0.0 PlaceboZoledronic acid -53.1 Zoledronic Acid Treatment Baseline VAS Change BML Area (mm2) Change -10.0 -100.0 -17.24 -164 -20.0 P=0.04 -200.0 P=0.02 6 Months Post Treatment • Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (N=59): – Placebo (n=28), zoledronic acid IV (n=31) • Primary endpoints: – Pain intensity measured using 100-mm VAS – BML size on MRI Laslett LL, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:1322-8. MRI images courtesy of Prof . Graeme Jones.

GRAPHIC

 


 A Phase 3 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of AXS-02 in the treatment of pain of knee OA associated with BMLs. Clinical Knee OA Symptom Treatment 1 Study Screening, Baseline Double-blind Phase (24 weeks) Special Prot ocol A ssessment (SPA ) receiv ed N=346 1:1 randomization Arm A (n=173) Arm B (n=173) AXS-02 (disodium zoledronate tetrahydrate) Placebo • Primary Endpoint: Change in pain intensity from baseline to week 24, measured using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). • Key Inclusion Criteria: – Male at least 50 years of age or postmenopausal female, with knee OA and BMLs – Moderate or worse knee pain • Dosage: Once per week for six weeks; no drug for remainder of double-blind phase. • Interim analysis to be performed on the first approximately 60 subjects enrolled.

 


 • Modic changes (MCs) type 1 (M1) on MRI are associated with chronic low back pain (CLBP).1 • Increased bone turnover on bone scan is seen in M1 lesions.2 • Increased pro-inflammatory cytokines, and vascular density seen in M1 lesions.3 • Zoledronic acid reduces bone turnover, suppresses the production of inflammatory mediators, and is anti-angiogenic. • Phase 2 results: Zoledronic acid reduced pain in patients with CLBP. • FDA clearance received for IND for Phase 3 trial – initiation planned following readouts from CREATE-1 and STRIDE-1. • Issued U.S. patents: protection into 2034 – uses of oral zoledronic acid for low back pain. MRI: lumbar side view* M1 A P Disc 1.6M patients in the U.S.4-7 * MRI show ing modic type 1 lesions f rom Luoma K, et al. European Congress of Radiology (ECR). 2014;Poster B-0458. 1. Zhang Y, et al. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1289-1299. 2. Järvinen J, et al. Spine: ISSLS Society Meeting Ab stracts. Oct. 2011;Volume Suppl, Abstract GP127. 3. Rahme R, Moussa R. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:838–42. 4. Law rence RC, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:26-35. 5. Zhang Y, Jordan. JM Clin Geriatr Med. 2010;26:355–69. 6. Jensen OK, et al. Spine J. Feb. 14, 2014;pii:S1529-9430(14)00214-9. 7. U.S. Census Bureau, Population April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013.

GRAPHIC

 


 Change in Pain Intensity at 1 Month NSAID Use at One Year 80% 0.0 VAS Change -2.0 PlaceboZoledronic acid -0.9 -2.2 60% 40% 20% 60% P=0.02 20% -3.0 % of Patients Using NSAIDs 0% PlaceboZoledronic acid • Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (N=40): – Placebo (n=20), zoledronic acid IV (n=20) • Primary endpoint: Pain intensity measured using 10-cm VAS. Axsome data on f ile.

GRAPHIC

 


 MoSEIC™ Meloxicam Novel therapy for Acute and Chronic Pain

GRAPHIC

 


MoSEIC™ Acute and Chronic Pain: MoSEIC™ Meloxicam Overview • MoSEIC™ meloxicam is a potent, oral, rapidly-absorbed, once-daily, non-opioid, COX-2 preferential, pain therapeutic. • Standard meloxicam has an extended Tm ax (4-6 hours) which delays its onset of action.1,2 • Axsome’s MoSEIC™ (Molecular Solubility Enhanced Inclusion Complex) technology substantially increases the rate of absorption of meloxicam while maintaining its approximately 20-hour half-life. • Phase 1 results: 9 times faster Tm ax, higher Cm ax and similar half-life, compared to Mobic®. • Potential utility for acute and chronic pain indications. • AXS-06 is a fixed-dose combination of MoSEIC™ meloxicam and esomeprazole (to reduce risk of NSAID-associated ulcers). • AXS-06 is Phase 3-ready based on received Pre-IND written guidance. 120M in the U.S.3,4 Abbreviations : Es o = Es om eprazole; Mx = Meloxicam ; OA = Os teoarthritis ; RA = Rheum atoid Arthritis . 1. Mobic® (meloxicam) FDA Package Insert. 2. Euller-Ziegler et al., Inflamm Res 50, Supplement 1 (2001) S5–S9. 3. Peura and Goldkind, Arthritis Res Ther. 7, Supplement 4 (2005) S7–S13. 4. U.S. Census Bureau, Population: 2000 and 2016.

GRAPHIC

 


MoSEIC™ Acute and Chronic Pain: MoSEIC™ Meloxicam Phase 1 Results 2,500 2,000 ng/mL Mean Meloxicam Concentrations Meloxicam Tm ax after 15 mg Dose MoSEIC™ Meloxicam Mobic® MoSEIC™ - Oral 14 1,000 IV (infusion) 500 - 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Hours IM Mobic® - Oral 24 0 1 2 3 4 5 Hours • MoSEIC™ meloxicam Tmax 9 times faster than Mobic® (0.5 hour versus 4.5 hours, respectively, p<0.0001). • Therapeutic plasma levels achieved within 15 minutes of oral dosing of MoSEIC™ meloxicam. • MoSEIC™ meloxicam had higher mean Cmax (p=0.0018), faster time to therapeutic plasma concentration (p<0.0001), and time to half-maximal plasma concentration (p<0.0001) as compared to Mobic®. • Terminal half-lives were approximately 20 hours for MoSEIC™ meloxicam and 22 hours for Mobic®. Sources: Axsome data on f ile. IV and IM data f rom Euller-Ziegler et al., Inflamm Res 50, Supplement 1 (2001) S5–S9.

GRAPHIC

 


 Barriers to Entry 53 Issued U.S. Patents* 6 Issued O-U.S. Patents Claims extending to 2034 >50 pending 20 Issued U.S. Patents 1 Issued O-U.S. Patent Claims extending to 2034 >40 pending Proprietary Manufacturing API Synthesis E.U. Orphan Medicinal Product Designation (10 yrs exclusivity, 12 yrs with PIP) AXS-02 AXS-05 Proprietary Manufacturing Drug Product Formulation U.S. Orphan Drug Designation (7 yrs exclusivity) *Claim s cover AXS-02 and related s ubs tances and dis ease indications.

 


 Our Team Management Herriot Tabuteau, MD Founder & CEO John Golubieski, MBA CFO Cedric O’Gorman, MD, MBA SVP, Clinical Development & Medical Affairs Mark Jacobson, MA SVP, Operations Robert Niecestro, PhD VP, Clinical & Regulatory Board of Directors Roger Jeffs, PhD Former President, Co-CEO, Director United Therapeutics Corp. Prior positions at Amgen and Burroughs Wellcome Myrtle Potter Former President, COO Genentech Prior positions at Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck Mark Saad Former CFO Bird Rock Bio, Inc. Former COO of the Global Healthcare Group at UBS Mark Coleman, MD Medical Director National Spine and Pain Centers Diplomat of the American Board of Anesthesiology Herriot Tabuteau, MD Chairman

GRAPHIC

 


 Key Financial Information As of June 30, 2017 Cash: $38.0 Million Debt (Face V alue)1: $10.0 Million Common Shares Outstanding: 23.6 Million Options and Warrants Outstanding2: 2.4 Million • Financial guidance: Cash anticipated to fund operating requirements into the first quarter of 2019. 1. Book value of $10.0 m illion. 2. Cons is ts of 2.2 m illion options and 0.2 m illion warrants .

GRAPHIC

 


 Anticipated Near-Term Clinical Milestones Abbreviations : AD = Alzheim er’s Dis ease; BUP = Bupropion; DZT = Dis odium Zoledronate Tetrahydrate; CLBP = Chronic Low Back Pain; CRPS = Com plex Regional Pain Syndrom e; DM = Dextrom ethorphan; OA = Os teoarthritis ; TRD = Treatm ent Res is tant Depression; Mx = Meloxicam ; Es o = Es om eprazole; RA = Rheum atoid Arthritis . Accom plis hed m ilestone. • Upcom ing m ilestone.

GRAPHIC

 


 For more information, please contact Mark Jacobson SVP, Operations 212-332-3243 mjacobson@A xsome.com axsome.com

GRAPHIC