UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(D)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
September 18, 2017
Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
001-37635 |
|
45-4241907 |
(State or other jurisdiction |
|
(Commission |
|
(IRS Employer |
of incorporation) |
|
File Number) |
|
Identification No.) |
25 Broadway, 9th Floor |
|
|
New York, New York |
|
10004 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (212) 332-3241
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425).
o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12).
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)).
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging growth company x
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. x
Item 8.01. Other Events
On September 26, 2017 and September 27, 2017, Herriot Tabuteau, M.D., Axsome Therapeutics (the Company) Chief Executive Officer will present at the Ladenburg Thalmann 2017 Healthcare Conference and The Cantor Fitzgerald Global Healthcare Conference (the Conferences), respectively. Dr. Tabuteau will be presenting at the Conferences to provide an overview of the Companys business and late-stage clinical product candidates, AXS-02, AXS-05, and AXS-06.
Attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K is a copy of the updated presentation slide deck to be used in connection with these planned presentations.
Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(d) Exhibits.
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
99.1 |
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. | |
|
| |
|
| |
Dated: September 18, 2017 |
By: |
/s/ Herriot Tabuteau, M.D. |
|
Name: Herriot Tabuteau, M.D. | |
|
Title: Chief Executive Officer |
Forward-Looking Statements & Safe Harbor Certain information contained in this presentation may include forward-looking statements within the meani ng of the Pri vate Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We may, in some cases, use terms such as predicts, believes, potential, conti nue, estimates, anticipates, expects, plans, intends, may, could, might, will, should or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes to identify these forward-looking statements. In particular, the Companys statements regarding trends and potential future results are examples of such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements include risks and uncertai nties, includi ng, but not limited to, the success, timi ng and cost of our ongoing clinical trials and anticipated clinical trials for our current product candidates, including statements regarding the timing of initiation and completion of the trials, interim analyses and receipt of interim results; the timing of and our ability to obtai n and maintain U.S. Food and Drug Administration or other regulatory authority approval of, or other action with respect to, our product candidates; the Companys ability to obtain additional capital necessary to fund its operations; the Companys ability to generate revenues in the future; the Companys ability to successfully defend its intellectual property or obtain the necessary licenses at a cost acceptable to the Company, if at all; the successful implementation of the Companys research and development programs; the enforceability of the Companys license agreements; the acceptance by the market of the Companys product candidates, if approved; and other factors, i ncluding general economic conditions and regulatory developments, not withi n the Companys control. These factors could cause actual results and developments to be materially different from those expressed in or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results may differ materially from those projected . The forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of this presentation and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstance. This presentation also contains estimates and other statistical data made by i ndependent parties and by us relating to market size and other data about our i ndustry. This data i nvolves a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates. Neither we nor any other person makes any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such data or undertakes any obligation to update such data after the date of this presentation. In addition, these projections, assumptions and estimates are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk.
Axsome is addressing growing markets, where current treatment options are limited or inadequate, by leveraging well-characterized compounds to create nov el therapeutics to meet unmet medical needs and improve the lives of patients.
Our Candidates and Pipeline Three differentiated late-stage assets targeting significant and growing markets: AXS-02: oral, non-opioid, long-acting, potentially first-in-class therapeutic for chronic pain AXS-05: novel therapeutic combination with multiple mechanisms for CNS disorders AXS-06: rapidly-absorbed, once-daily, non-opioid, pain therapeutic with a gastroprotectant Results from 3 ongoing Phase 3 trials expected over the next 12 months. Novel indications, positive proofs of concept. Patent protection to 2034, Worldwide rights. Product Candidate Preclinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 AXS-05 (DM + BUP) AXS-02 (DZT) AXS-06 (MoSEIC Mx + Eso) Treatment Resistant Depression: Fast Track Granted Initiated Agitation in Alzheimers Disease: Fast Track Granted Initiated CRPS: U.S. & E.U. Orphan Designation; Fast Track Granted Initiated Knee OA with BMLs: SPA Received; Fast Track Granted Initiated CLBP with MCs OA and RA Abbreviations : BML = Bone Marrow Les ions ; BUP = Bupropion; CLBP = Chronic Low Back Pain; CRPS = Com plex Regional Pain Syndrom e; DM = Dextrom ethorphan; DZT = Dis odium Zoledronate Tetrahydrate; Es o = Es om eprazole; MC = Modic Changes ; Mx = Meloxicam ;OA = Os teoarthritis ; RA = Rheum atoid Arthritis ; SPA = Special Protocol As s es s ment.
AXS-05 Dextromethorphan (DM) + Bupropion (BUP) Novel therapy for CNS disorders: Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) Agitation in Alzheimers Disease (AD)
Relevant Indications Related Agents Ketam ne Memant ne Namenda® F uvoxam ne Luvox® DonepezA cept® Duloxet ne Cymbal a® Venlafax ne E exor® Esc alopram Lexapro® F uoxet ne P ozac® Ser al ne Zolof ® Bupropion Wel but n® Bupropion Wel but n® Relevant Pharmacodynamic Synergy Mechanism of Action DM BUP AXS-05 DM+BUP NMDA Receptor Antagonist Sigma-1R Agonist Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitor Nicotinic ACh Receptor Antagonist i() li() il ( ri) i(t) i( ff) it() li( r) tr i(t ) (lri) (lri) DM = Dextrom ethorphan; BUP = Bupropion.Pres ent
Pharmacodynamic Synergy Relevant Indications1 Mechanism of Action DM BUP AXS-05 DM+BUP NMDA Receptor Antagonist Sigma-1R Agonist Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitor Nicotinic ACh Receptor Antagonist Ketamine Memantine (Namenda®) Fluvoxamine (Luvox®) Donepezil (Aricept®) Duloxetine (Cymbalta®) Venlafaxine (Effexor®) Escitalopram (Lexapro®) Fluoxetine (Prozac®) Sertraline (Zoloft®) Bupropion (Wellbutrin®) Bupropion (Wellbutrin®) DM = Dextrom ethorphan; BUP = Bupropion. Pres ent Relevant 1. Indications listed are associated w ith the mechanism of action and are not related to either DM or BUP, unless specif ically noted. 2. Agents do not contain DM or BUP, unless specif ically noted.
DM Alone DM DXO DM Rapid metabolism Difficult to achieve potential therapeutic plasma levels. AXS-05 (DM + BUP) Inhibits DM metabolism BUPDM DXO DMBUP Pharmacokinetic synergy Potential pharmacodynamic synergy Potential efficacy in CNS disorders DM concentration increased to therapeutic range DM = Dextrom ethorphan; DXO = Dextrorphan; BUP = Bupropion. Phase 1 trials with AXS-05 completed: Significant increase in DM plasma levels. Phase 3 trials in TRD and AD Agitation initiated. BUP active at CNS receptors IP Overview 21 issued patents protection through 2034.
Dextromethorphan AUC Dextromethorphan Cm ax 1700 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 160.0 1686 Cmax ng/mL AUC0-12 ng*hr/mL 80.0 28 0 DM 60 mgDM 60 mg + BUP 150 mg (AXS-05) 0.0 3.8 DM 60 mgDM 60 mg + BUP 150 mg (AXS-05) Axsome data on f ile. DM, Dextromethorphan; BUP, Bupropion.
Dextromethorphan AUC Dextromethorphan Cm ax 1700 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 160.0 1686 Cmax ng/mL AUC0-12 ng*hr/mL 80.0 28 0 DM 60 mgDM 60 mg + BUP 150 mg (AXS-05) 0.0 3.8 DM 60 mgDM 60 mg + BUP 150 mg Dose Cm ax ng/mL DM 20 mg + Q 10 mg 53 DM 30 mg + Q 10 mg 85 Axsome data on f ile. Nuedexta® NDA 021879, FDA Clinical Pharmacology Review . DM, Dextromethorphan; Q, Quinidine; BUP, Bupropion.
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disease burden in the US.4 63% and 44% of MDD patients have inadequate response to initial therapy and second line therapy, respectively.2 Only 1 approved drug for TRD = unmet medical need. AXS-05 combines the MOA of 4 distinct anti-depressant drug classes into one novel oral therapeutic. DM antidepressant effects demonstrated preclinically and clinically. Phase 3 ongoing. 3M patients in the U.S.1-3 Product Candidate Preclinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 AXS-05 Treatment Resistant Depression: Fast Track GrantedInitiated 1. Marcus SC, Olf son M. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010;67:1265-1273. 2. Rush AJ, et al. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:1905-1917. 3. U.S. Census Bureau, Population April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013. 4. Mathers CD, PLoS Med 2006; 3(11): e442.
DM and metabolic inhibitor reduce depressive symptoms in TRD and in AD. Symptom Reduction in TRD Patients Treated with DM and Metabolic Inhibitor1 Depressive Symptom Reduction in AD Agitation Patients Treated with DM and Metabolic Inhibitor2 DM+Q Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating (MADRS) Scale (30/10 mg) Change in Cornell Scale Score -5 -10 -15 ** ** ** ** 0.0 -0.5 -20 DM/Q Titration DM/Q 45/10 mg q 12 hrs Wk 1 Wk 2 Wk 4 Wk 6 Wk 8 Wk 12 Time (weeks) -1.0 P=0.002 Failed 2 to 10 prior treatments 45% of patients had 50% reduction in MADRS ** P<0.01 versus baseline 1. Murrough J, et al. J Affect Disord. 2017;218:277-283. 2. Cummings J, et al. JAMA. 2015;314:1242-1254.
A Phase 3 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of AXS-05 in the treatment of TRD. 1:1 randomization of inadequate responders Period 1, Open-label (6 weeks)Period 2, Double-blind (6 weeks) N=346 Arm A AXS-05 Bupropion BUP = Bupropion; DM = Dextrom ethorphan. (n=173) Arm B (n=173) (BUP + DM) Bupropion Primary Endpoint: Change in depression score from randomization to end of study, measured using the Montgomery-As berg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Key Inclusion Criteria: Male or female 18-65 years old History of inadequate response to 1 or 2 adequate antidepressant treatments
Agitation and aggression seen in approximately 45% of AD patients during 5-year period.3 Characterized by emotional distress, aggressive behaviors, disruptive irritability, disinhibition, and caregiver burden.4 Associated with4,5: Accelerated cognitive decline Earlier nursing home placement Increased mortality No approved medication = unmet medical need. Proof of concept: DM plus metabolic inhibitor reduced agitation in AD patients. Phase 2/3 ongoing. 2M patients in the U.S.1,2 Product Candidate Preclinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 AXS-05 Agitation in Alzheimers Disease: Fast Track GrantedInitiated 1. Ryu, SH, et al. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;13:976-983. 2. Hebert, LE, et al. Neurology. 2013;80:1778-1783. 3. Steinberg M, et al. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;2:170-177. 4. Antonsdottir IM, et al. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;11:1649-1656. 5. Rabins PV et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2013; 9:204-207.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-stage trial. Placebo (n=125), 30 mg DM + 10 mg quinidine (Q) (n=93), for stage 1. DM+Q treatment reduced agitation/ aggression in AD by 46% vs. 24% for placebo (P<0.001)primary endpoint. Statistically significant improvement in multiple secondary endpoints. DM plasma levels achieved with AXS-05 in target therapeutic range. Potential for additional contribution from bupropion component of AXS-05. Change in Agitation/Aggression Scores in AD with DM and Metabolic Inhibitor Quinidine (Q) PlaceboDM+Q Change in NPI Agitation/Aggression Domain -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 P<0.001 -4.0 Cummings J, et al. JAMA. 2015;314:1242-1254.
A Phase 2/3 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of AXS-05 in the treatment of Agitation in AD. Screening Double-blind Phase (5 weeks) Arm A (n=145) Arm B (n=145) Arm C (n=145) (BUP + DM) N=435 1:1:1 randomization Bupropion Placebo BUP = Bupropion; DM = Dextrom ethorphan. Primary Endpoint: Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI). Key Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of probable Alzheimers disease Clinically significant agitation Interim analysis planned.
S-02 Disodium Zoledronate Tetrahydrate Novel therapy for chronic pain: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) with Bone Marrow Lesions (BMLs) Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) with Modic Changes (MCs) CRPS image source: Voet C, et al. F1000Reseach. 2014;3:97.
AXS-02 Disodium Zoledronate Tetrahydrate Oral Dose Long-acting Targeted Therapy Non-opioid Nov el Mechanism IP Overview 59 issued patents* protection through 2034. Drug delivery, pharmacokinetic, composition of matter, and method of use claims. U.S. Orphan Drug Designation (7 years exclusivity). E.U. Orphan Medicinal Product Designation (10 years exclusivity, 12 years with PIP). *Claims cover AXS-02 and related substances and disease indications.
AXS-02 Disodium Zoledronate Tetrahydrate Inhibits bone-resorbing osteoclasts Downregulates acid-sensing* ion channels Reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine production Anti-angiogenic Decreased bone resorption. Farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS).1 ASIC1a expression. ASIC activation.2 TRPV1 activation.2,3 TNF production.4 IL-6 production.5 IL-8 production.6 Angiogenesis.7 c-FOS expression.2 * Acid is a w ell know n cause of pain. 1. Green JR, Rogers MJ. Drug Dev Res. 2002;55:210-24. 2. Nagae M, et al. Bone. 2006;39:1107-15. 3. Abe Y, et al. J Bone Miner Metab . 2015;33:125134. 4. Wolf AM, et al. Haematologica. 2006;91:1165-71. 5. Derenne S, et al. Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:2048-56. 6. Stathopoulos GT, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178:50-9. 7. Misso G, et al. Cancer Biol Ther. 2012;13:1491-500.
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Localized bone resorption.1,2 Increased pro-inflammatory cytokines.3 Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) with Bone Marrow Lesions (BMLs) BMLs are associated with pain in knee OA.5 BMLs: Increased bone turnover; Decreased bone mineral density.6,7 Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) with Modic Changes (MCs) MCs are associated with low back pain.8 MCs: Increased bone turnover, pro-inflammatory cytokines, vascular density.9,10 case per year in the U.S.4 7M patients in the U.S.11-14,16 1.6M patients in the U.S.11,12,15,16 1. Capello ZJ, et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:288-296. 2. Krämer HH, et al. Pain. 2014;155:889895. 3. Parkitny L, et al. Neurology. 2013;80:106-117. 4. Moseley GL, et al. J Pain. 2014;15:16-23. 5. Driban JB, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R112. 6. Hunter DJ, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11:R11. 7. Kazakia GJ, et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:94-101. 8. Zhang Y, et al. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1289-1299. 9. Järvinen J, et al. Spine: ISSLS Society Meeting Ab stracts. Oct. 2011(vol suppl, abstract GP127). 10. Rahme R, Moussa R. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:83842. 11. Law rence RC, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:26-35. 12. Zhang Y, Jordan. JM Clin Geriatr Med. 2010;26:35569. 13. Tanamas SK, et al. Rheumatology. 2010;49:241319. 14. Guermazi A, et al. BMJ. 2012;345:e5339. 15. Jensen OK, et al. Spine J. Feb. 14, 2014;pii:S1529-9430(14)00214-9. 16. U.S. Census Bureau, Population April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013.
Phase 1 Summary Oral administration of AXS-02 resulted in rapid absorption of zoledronic acid. Significant plasma levels attained. Robust pharmacodynamics (PD) effects. PD relevant to targeted pain indications. AXS-02 was well tolerated. 0% -50% Time (Days) 0 4 8 12 16 Zoledronic acid IV (1mg) AXS-02 Oral Tablet (Dose A) AXS-02 Oral Tablet (Dose B) AXS-02 Oral Tablet (Dose C) Change in Osteoclast Activity (Serum CTx) Assessed in 6,097 patients treated 3 years with oral or IV bisphosphonates: Oral: clodronate or ibandronate, daily IV: zoledronic acid, monthly, then every 6 months Oral preference at randomization and -100% Patient Preference 60% 40% 20% 0% 24% 76% therapy completion: 76%, 73% respectively. Potential safety advantage. IV Preference Oral Preference 1. Gralow , et al. J Clin Oncol. 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 503). 2. Gralow , et al. J Clin Oncol. 32.5, 2014 (suppl; abstr 558).
CRPS Overview Severe, continuous, disabling pain in a limb: Sensation described as burning, stabbing, grinding, throbbing Localized bone resorption,1,2 increased pro-inflammatory cytokines.3 Common pain meds (e.g., NSAIDs, opioids, gabapentin) are considered ineffective.4 No approved drug = high unmet need. Phase 3 ongoing. Issued U.S. patents: protection into 2034 uses of oral zoledronic acid for CRPS. *Bone scan: hands** Orphan Disease case per year in the U.S.5 Product Candidate Preclinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 AXS-02 CRPS: U.S. & E.U. Orphan Designation; Fast Track GrantedInitiated * Goebel A, Complex regional pain syndrome in adult. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(10):1739-1750, by permission of Oxf ord University Press. ** Sampath S, et al. Indian J Nucl Med.2013;Jan-Mar;28(1):1116. 1. Capello ZJ, et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:288-296. 2. Krämer HH, et al. Pain. 2014;155:889895. 3. Parkitny L, et al. Neurology. 2013;80:106-117. 4. Bruehl S. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:713-725. 5. Moseley GL, et al. J Pain. 2014;15:16-23.
Preclinical: Well validated CRPS model replicates: Inciting trauma, clinical presentation, natural history, and pathologic changes. Oral administration of AXS-02: Significant pain and edema reduction; improved weight bearing. AXS-02 Effect in CRPS Model % Change vs. Placebo 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 Clinical: Clinical Trials: 5 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, with 4 different bisphosphonates.1-5 Pain reduction: Mean 54% reduction in VAS pain scores (range 33% to 66%) during double-blind phases. Statistical significance: p<0.0001, p=0.001, p<0.01, p<0.05, p=0.048. Potency of bisphosphonates: 1/1000 to 1/20 potency of AXS-02.6 -80 -100 P<0.001 P=0.03 1. Adami S, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56:201-204. 2. Varenna M, et al. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:1477-1483. 3. Robinson JN, et al. Pain Med. 2004;5:276-280. 4. Manicourt DH, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:3690-3697. PainEdemaWeight Bearing 5. Varenna M, et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52:534-542. 6. Green JR, Rogers MJ. Drug Dev Res. 2002;55:210-224.
CRPS Phase 3 Design CRPS Treatment Evaluation 1 Study A Phase 3 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of AXS-02 in the treatment of pain associated with CRPS type 1. Screening, Baseline Double-blind Phase (12 weeks) N=190 1:1 randomization Arm A (n=95) Arm B (n=95) AXS-02 (disodium zoledronate tetrahydrate) Placebo 12 week follow-up Primary Endpoint: Change in pain intensity from baseline to week 12, measured using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Key Inclusion Criteria: Male or female 18 years old, recently diagnosed with CRPS type 1 Average NRS pain intensity score of 5 Dosage: Once per week for six weeks; no drug for last six weeks. Interim analysis: When approximately half of patients have completed double-blind phase.
Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) on MRI are associated with pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA).1 BMLs are regions of increased bone turnover, and reduced mineral density.2,3 Zoledronic acid inhibits bone resorption and increases mineral density. MRI: knee side view* Femur A P Phase 2 results: Zoledronic acid reduced pain and BML size in patients with knee osteoarthritis. BML Tibia Phase 3 being conducted under Special Protocol Assessment (SPA). Issued U.S. patents: protection into 2034 uses of zoledronic acid for knee pain. 7M patients in the U.S.4-9 * MRI show ing BML in medial tibia f rom Driban, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R112. 1. Driban JB, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R112. 2. Hunter DJ, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11:R11. 3. Kazakia GJ, et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:94-101. 4. Law rence RC, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:26-35. 5. Zhang Y, Jordan. JM Clin Geriatr Med. 2010;26:35569. 6. Tanamas SK, et al. Rheumatology. 2010;49:241319. 7. Guermazi A, et al. BMJ. 2012;345:e5339. 8. Jensen OK, et al. Spine J. Feb. 14, 2014;pii:S1529-9430(14)00214-9. 9. U.S. Census Bureau, Population April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013.
Change in Pain Intensity at 6 Mos Change in BML Size at 6 Mos BML at Baseline and Post 0.0 PlaceboZoledronic acid 0.0 PlaceboZoledronic acid -53.1 Zoledronic Acid Treatment Baseline VAS Change BML Area (mm2) Change -10.0 -100.0 -17.24 -164 -20.0 P=0.04 -200.0 P=0.02 6 Months Post Treatment Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (N=59): Placebo (n=28), zoledronic acid IV (n=31) Primary endpoints: Pain intensity measured using 100-mm VAS BML size on MRI Laslett LL, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:1322-8. MRI images courtesy of Prof . Graeme Jones.
A Phase 3 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of AXS-02 in the treatment of pain of knee OA associated with BMLs. Clinical Knee OA Symptom Treatment 1 Study Screening, Baseline Double-blind Phase (24 weeks) Special Prot ocol A ssessment (SPA ) receiv ed N=346 1:1 randomization Arm A (n=173) Arm B (n=173) AXS-02 (disodium zoledronate tetrahydrate) Placebo Primary Endpoint: Change in pain intensity from baseline to week 24, measured using the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Key Inclusion Criteria: Male at least 50 years of age or postmenopausal female, with knee OA and BMLs Moderate or worse knee pain Dosage: Once per week for six weeks; no drug for remainder of double-blind phase. Interim analysis to be performed on the first approximately 60 subjects enrolled.
Modic changes (MCs) type 1 (M1) on MRI are associated with chronic low back pain (CLBP).1 Increased bone turnover on bone scan is seen in M1 lesions.2 Increased pro-inflammatory cytokines, and vascular density seen in M1 lesions.3 Zoledronic acid reduces bone turnover, suppresses the production of inflammatory mediators, and is anti-angiogenic. Phase 2 results: Zoledronic acid reduced pain in patients with CLBP. FDA clearance received for IND for Phase 3 trial initiation planned following readouts from CREATE-1 and STRIDE-1. Issued U.S. patents: protection into 2034 uses of oral zoledronic acid for low back pain. MRI: lumbar side view* M1 A P Disc 1.6M patients in the U.S.4-7 * MRI show ing modic type 1 lesions f rom Luoma K, et al. European Congress of Radiology (ECR). 2014;Poster B-0458. 1. Zhang Y, et al. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1289-1299. 2. Järvinen J, et al. Spine: ISSLS Society Meeting Ab stracts. Oct. 2011;Volume Suppl, Abstract GP127. 3. Rahme R, Moussa R. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:83842. 4. Law rence RC, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:26-35. 5. Zhang Y, Jordan. JM Clin Geriatr Med. 2010;26:35569. 6. Jensen OK, et al. Spine J. Feb. 14, 2014;pii:S1529-9430(14)00214-9. 7. U.S. Census Bureau, Population April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013.
Change in Pain Intensity at 1 Month NSAID Use at One Year 80% 0.0 VAS Change -2.0 PlaceboZoledronic acid -0.9 -2.2 60% 40% 20% 60% P=0.02 20% -3.0 % of Patients Using NSAIDs 0% PlaceboZoledronic acid Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (N=40): Placebo (n=20), zoledronic acid IV (n=20) Primary endpoint: Pain intensity measured using 10-cm VAS. Axsome data on f ile.
MoSEIC Meloxicam Novel therapy for Acute and Chronic Pain
MoSEIC Acute and Chronic Pain: MoSEIC Meloxicam Overview MoSEIC meloxicam is a potent, oral, rapidly-absorbed, once-daily, non-opioid, COX-2 preferential, pain therapeutic. Standard meloxicam has an extended Tm ax (4-6 hours) which delays its onset of action.1,2 Axsomes MoSEIC (Molecular Solubility Enhanced Inclusion Complex) technology substantially increases the rate of absorption of meloxicam while maintaining its approximately 20-hour half-life. Phase 1 results: 9 times faster Tm ax, higher Cm ax and similar half-life, compared to Mobic®. Potential utility for acute and chronic pain indications. AXS-06 is a fixed-dose combination of MoSEIC meloxicam and esomeprazole (to reduce risk of NSAID-associated ulcers). AXS-06 is Phase 3-ready based on received Pre-IND written guidance. 120M in the U.S.3,4 Abbreviations : Es o = Es om eprazole; Mx = Meloxicam ; OA = Os teoarthritis ; RA = Rheum atoid Arthritis . 1. Mobic® (meloxicam) FDA Package Insert. 2. Euller-Ziegler et al., Inflamm Res 50, Supplement 1 (2001) S5S9. 3. Peura and Goldkind, Arthritis Res Ther. 7, Supplement 4 (2005) S7S13. 4. U.S. Census Bureau, Population: 2000 and 2016.
MoSEIC Acute and Chronic Pain: MoSEIC Meloxicam Phase 1 Results 2,500 2,000 ng/mL Mean Meloxicam Concentrations Meloxicam Tm ax after 15 mg Dose MoSEIC Meloxicam Mobic® MoSEIC - Oral 14 1,000 IV (infusion) 500 - 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Hours IM Mobic® - Oral 24 0 1 2 3 4 5 Hours MoSEIC meloxicam Tmax 9 times faster than Mobic® (0.5 hour versus 4.5 hours, respectively, p<0.0001). Therapeutic plasma levels achieved within 15 minutes of oral dosing of MoSEIC meloxicam. MoSEIC meloxicam had higher mean Cmax (p=0.0018), faster time to therapeutic plasma concentration (p<0.0001), and time to half-maximal plasma concentration (p<0.0001) as compared to Mobic®. Terminal half-lives were approximately 20 hours for MoSEIC meloxicam and 22 hours for Mobic®. Sources: Axsome data on f ile. IV and IM data f rom Euller-Ziegler et al., Inflamm Res 50, Supplement 1 (2001) S5S9.
Barriers to Entry 53 Issued U.S. Patents* 6 Issued O-U.S. Patents Claims extending to 2034 >50 pending 20 Issued U.S. Patents 1 Issued O-U.S. Patent Claims extending to 2034 >40 pending Proprietary Manufacturing API Synthesis E.U. Orphan Medicinal Product Designation (10 yrs exclusivity, 12 yrs with PIP) AXS-02 AXS-05 Proprietary Manufacturing Drug Product Formulation U.S. Orphan Drug Designation (7 yrs exclusivity) *Claim s cover AXS-02 and related s ubs tances and dis ease indications.
Our Team Management Herriot Tabuteau, MD Founder & CEO John Golubieski, MBA CFO Cedric OGorman, MD, MBA SVP, Clinical Development & Medical Affairs Mark Jacobson, MA SVP, Operations Robert Niecestro, PhD VP, Clinical & Regulatory Board of Directors Roger Jeffs, PhD Former President, Co-CEO, Director United Therapeutics Corp. Prior positions at Amgen and Burroughs Wellcome Myrtle Potter Former President, COO Genentech Prior positions at Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck Mark Saad Former CFO Bird Rock Bio, Inc. Former COO of the Global Healthcare Group at UBS Mark Coleman, MD Medical Director National Spine and Pain Centers Diplomat of the American Board of Anesthesiology Herriot Tabuteau, MD Chairman
Key Financial Information As of June 30, 2017 Cash: $38.0 Million Debt (Face V alue)1: $10.0 Million Common Shares Outstanding: 23.6 Million Options and Warrants Outstanding2: 2.4 Million Financial guidance: Cash anticipated to fund operating requirements into the first quarter of 2019. 1. Book value of $10.0 m illion. 2. Cons is ts of 2.2 m illion options and 0.2 m illion warrants .
Anticipated Near-Term Clinical Milestones Abbreviations : AD = Alzheim ers Dis ease; BUP = Bupropion; DZT = Dis odium Zoledronate Tetrahydrate; CLBP = Chronic Low Back Pain; CRPS = Com plex Regional Pain Syndrom e; DM = Dextrom ethorphan; OA = Os teoarthritis ; TRD = Treatm ent Res is tant Depression; Mx = Meloxicam ; Es o = Es om eprazole; RA = Rheum atoid Arthritis . Accom plis hed m ilestone. Upcom ing m ilestone.
For more information, please contact Mark Jacobson SVP, Operations 212-332-3243 mjacobson@A xsome.com axsome.com